Legal Opinion

Seeco, Inc. v. Hales

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 30, 1997No. 96-1392PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

Appellants SEECO, Inc. (SEECO), and Arkansas Western Gas Company (AWG) are wholly owned subsidiaries of appellant Southwestern Electric Company (Southwestern). Appellees Allen Hales, et al. (the royalty owners), are lessors under various oil and gas leases possessed by SEECO who brought a class action suit to claim royalties that were allegedly due but not paid. The trial court certified the royalty owners as a class after considering the criteria set out in Rule 23(a) and (b) of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure. The class is estimated to consist of more than…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re Catfish Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1993
  2. Walco Investments, Inc. v. ThenenDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
  3. In re Industrial Diamonds Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  4. Smith v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1989
  5. Clark v. RidgewaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Sanofi Winthrop Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Fraley v. Williams Ford Tractor & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. BPS, Inc. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. BNL Equity Corp. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Seeco, Inc. v. HalesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API