Legal Opinion

Chock v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 2003No. 23356PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

DUFFY, J.

Plaintifi'-AppellantyCross-Appellee Aaron Chock appeals from the final judgment entered on April 7, 2000 by the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, the Honorable Marie N. Milks presiding, in favor of Defendants-Ap-pellees/Cross-Appellants Government Employees Insurance Company and GEICO Casualty .Company [hereinafter, GEICO], denying Chock uninsured motorist (UM) benefits and awarding attorneys’ fees and costs in favor of GEICO and against Chock. On appeal, Chock contends that the circuit court erred: (1) in concluding that Chock was not entitled to UM benefits…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Dawes v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. AIG Hawaii Insurance v. Estate of CaraangHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Holm v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. DennisonHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Oahu Transit Services, Inc. v. Northfield Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Bank of Hawaii v. ShinnHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  4. County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Sheehan v. Centex HomesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API