Legal Opinion

Bino v. Veenhuizen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1926No. 20012. Department TwoPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of the trial court refusing to enter a claimed valid verdict of a jury in favor of the appellants. The facts follow:

At the close of the trial, the jury were sent out to deliberate upon their verdict. Later, the court was notified that they had reached a verdict, and he ordered them brought into open court. The jury was then asked if they had agreed upon a verdict in the case, and the foreman responded in the affirmative. The verdict, omitting the formal parts, was as follows:

“We the jury in the above entitled cause do find for the defendant. Not guilty.
“Virginia…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  2. Pearson v. Arlington Dock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Martin v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Coughlin v. WeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Stambaugh v. HayesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State v. BaddaWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Haney v. CheathamWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Lindsey v. ElkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API