Bino v. Veenhuizen
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.
This appeal is from a judgment of the trial court refusing to enter a claimed valid verdict of a jury in favor of the appellants. The facts follow:
At the close of the trial, the jury were sent out to deliberate upon their verdict. Later, the court was notified that they had reached a verdict, and he ordered them brought into open court. The jury was then asked if they had agreed upon a verdict in the case, and the foreman responded in the affirmative. The verdict, omitting the formal parts, was as follows:
“We the jury in the above entitled cause do find for the defendant. Not guilty.
“Virginia…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
- Pearson v. Arlington Dock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Martin v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Coughlin v. WeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by27 opinions
- Stambaugh v. HayesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. BaddaWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Haney v. CheathamWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Lindsey v. ElkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.