Legal Opinion
Hammond v. Pearle Vision, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided March 17, 2009No. 4:07-cv-00078Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID FOLSOM, District Judge.
Before the Court is Pearle’s Objection (Dkt. No. 82) to Magistrate Judge Craven’s Report and Recommendations (“Limitations R & R”) (Dkt. No. 81) denying Pearle’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Limitations (Dkt. No. 24). Also before the Court are Hammond’s Objections (Dkt. No. 88) to Magistrate Judge Craven’s Report and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 84) granting in part and denying in part Pearle’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 46), Pearle’s Response (Dkt. No. 90), and Hammond’s Notice of Supplemental Authority (Dkt. No. 92).
The Court held a hearing on all…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.