Legal Opinion

Fox v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 15, 1988No. 2473PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In the instant appeal, the appellant/plaintiffs, Mary and Harry Fox, appeal an August 4, 1987 order of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, granting appellee/defendant’s motion to strike the complaint for failure to make service upon the defendant. The sole reason given in the defendant’s motion to strike was that the plaintiffs never served their complaint on the defendant, as required by Pa.R.C.P. Rule 401, and therefore, defendant was denied his right to proper notice. We find that the trial court abused its discretion in granting defendant’s motion to strike the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lamp v. HeymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Hoeke v. Mercy Hospital of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Wible v. ApanowiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Keller v. LaBarreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Sherry v. Trexler-Haines Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Danziger & De Llano LLP v. Morgan Verkamp LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  2. Painewebber Incorporated Sheldon Chaiken Lee H. Lovejoy Anthony Presogna Kevin Collins v. Henry J. Faragalli, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Cahill v. SchultsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Trzcinski v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Zawacki v. Penpac, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API