Hoeke v. Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
In the instant appeal the defendants below challenge the lower court’s denial of their preliminary objections which questioned the validity of the court’s jurisdiction over their persons. In particular defendant-appellants argue that the writ of summons in trespass and assumpsit which was served upon them did not comply with the provisions of Rule 1010 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. For reasons which will later become apparent, sustaining their argument would be tantamount to terminating plaintiffs-appellees’ cause of action in trespass. On the facts present in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lamp v. HeymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Sharp v. Valley Forge Medical Center & Heart Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Monaco v. Montgomery Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Zarlinsky v. LaudenslagerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Peterson v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- McCreesh v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Schriver v. MazziottiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Leidich v. FranklinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Rosenberg v. NicholsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Fox v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.