Wible v. Apanowicz
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that the lower court erred in granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment. Specifically, she alleges that the court improperly calculated the time available for reinstating a complaint, or that appellee was arguably estopped from asserting the statute of limitations because she had frustrated service by giving false addresses. Finding appellant’s contentions without merit, we affirm the lower court’s order.
On May 10, 1976, appellant was involved in an auto accident with appellee, Grace Apanowicz, who was driving a car leased by her employer from appellee…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lamp v. HeymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Courts v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Mangino v. LielberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ingenito v. AC & S, INC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Bigansky v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Moyer v. RubrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- A. McD. v. RosenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Aivazoglou v. Drever FurnacesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.