Legal Opinion

Sherry v. Trexler-Haines Gas, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1988No. 00108PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

This is an appeal from an Order granting appellee’s preliminary objections in the nature of a motion to strike appellant’s joinder complaint. As appellant Trexler-Haines Gas, Inc. (hereinafter Trexler) followed proper procedure in joining Sun Gas Company (hereinafter Sun), Atlantic Rich-field, John P. Clarke, Co., and Charles A. Hones, Inc. as additional defendants, we hold that the trial court erred in dismissing appellant’s complaint joining those defendants. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

The facts giving rise to this appeal are simply stated. Appellee Barbara Sherry…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lamp v. HeymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. LUITWEILER v. Northchester Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Bureau of Traffic Safety v. ForteCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Cheng v. ChengSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Cox v. HottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ceresini v. Valley View Trailer ParkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Fox v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Hart v. BatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  4. Smith v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Baker v. S. & L. Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API