Legal Opinion

Carter v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 11, 1935No. 25784PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

Maude O. Thomas, hereinafter called plaintiff, instituted an action in the district court of Oklahoma county against F. C. Carter, as State Auditor of the state of Oklahoma, hereinafter called defendant, for a peremptory writ of mandamus to require the defendant to audit and allow a certain claim filed by the plaintiff. The- district court granted plaintiff judgment, and the defendant brings this appeal.

The case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts, a summary of the pertinent parts thereof is as follows:

Lew H. Wentz was appointed Highway Commissioner for a term of six years, as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hawks v. BlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Wentz v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Morford v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  4. Franks v. City of Ponca CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Naylor v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Veterans of Foreign Wars v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. Childrens Home & Welfare Ass'n v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Johnston v. ConnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Orthopedic Hospital of Oklahoma v. Oklahoma State Department of HealthCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API