Legal Opinion

Franks v. City of Ponca City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 18, 1934No. 23036PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Kay county, Okla., denying the claim of the plaintiff against the defendant for an amount claimed as salary due for services rendered as chief of police.

The defense was that the plaintiff was not a de jure officer and that a de facto officer is not entitled to a salary. The record shows that the plaintiff was a de facto officer and that no other person claimed title to the office.

The provisions of the charter of the defendant, which are applicable, are as follows:

“Section 45. Qualifications. Every person elected or appointed to any…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erwin v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  2. Elledge v. WhartonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  3. Uhr v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. State Ex Rel. Baca v. OteroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Roberts v. People Ex Rel. DuncanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, and Iowa Water Environment AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. Carter v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Torrance v. BladelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Childers v. PaulSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. DeFries v. Town of Washington, Okl.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API