Legal Opinion

Morford v. Territory of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1901PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error from the District Court of Payne County; before John jE. Bur ford, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

HaiNer, J.:

The appellant, Eobert Morford, was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of perjury in the 'district court of Payne county, and sentenced to serve a term of five years at hard labor in the territorial peni- íentiary, at Lansing, Kansas. The perjury of which the defendant was convicted was assigned upon certain alleged false testimony given in the case of the Territory v. William G. Martin, who was tried and convicted upon the charge of criminal libel in the probate court of Payne county, in November, 1897. There is no contention in the brief of counsel…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Wilcox v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. Hussey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Ex Parte Henry WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Carleton v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1862

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Faucette v. GerlachSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Jordan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  3. State v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Bennett v. District Court of Tulsa Co.Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Ajax Contractors, Inc. v. MyattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API