Legal Opinion
Johnston v. Conner
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 16, 1951No. 34182PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This is an original action in this court, wherein Henry S. Johnston, as petitioner, seeks a writ in mandamus requiring the respondents to perform such acts as are necessary to effect the payment to him of $16,000 as attorney’s fees for which appropriation was made by the 1949 Legislature.
The facts upon which' this action is founded are fully set out in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Henry S. Johnston, 192 Okla. 203, 134 P. 2d 335, in which this court denied recovery of the above amount from Tulsa county. It is, therefore, unnecessary to restate them in detail.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Amos v. MathewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- People Ex Rel. Griffin v. Mayor of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- State Ex Rel. Haskell v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Gordon v. . CornesNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tulsa Exposition & Fair Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Shipp v. Southeastern Oklahoma Industries AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Board of County Commissioners v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Johnston v. ConnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Opinion No. (1985), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.