Legal Opinion

De La Cuesta v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1984No. Docket Nos. 30849, 30850PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

These are consolidated original proceedings in mandate to compel the Orange County Superior Court to determine the prevailing party and amount of reasonable attorney fees pursuant to Civil Code section 1717 in unsuccessful actions to enjoin trust deed foreclosure sales. This court issued alternative writs, but we have concluded that petitioners have misconceived their remedy and lack the necessary beneficial interest requisite to issuance of a peremptory writ. We shall therefore deny issuance of the peremptory writ and discharge the alternative writ heretofore issued.

For…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Saucedo v. Mercury Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. In Re Marriage of CuevaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Passanisi v. Merit-McBride Realtors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Bouvia v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Mustachio v. Great Western BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. MST Farms v. C. G. 1464California Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. California Recreation Industries v. KiersteadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API