Legal Opinion

State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 3, 1906No. Nos. 14,689—(23)PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Dibell, J., overruling a general demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This action was brought under the provisions of section 7, c. 163, p. 352, Laws 1895, to recover treble damages for an alleged wilful trespass upon lands owned by the state by cutting and removing timber therefrom. Defendant interposed a general demurrer to the complaint, and from an order overruling it appealed to this court.

It is alleged in the complaiift that at the time stated therein defendant, a corporation, wilfully, wrongfully, and unlawfully, well knowing *160that the state was the owner thereof, entered upon certain school lands of the state and cut and removed therefrom two million…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. People v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Brown v. SwinefordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Mayer v. FrobeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Commonwealth v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. MosengSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. State v. MoilenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. Meshbesher v. Channellene Oil & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. People v. MalleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Stout v. State Ex Rel. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API