Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Frobe

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1895PublishedCited by 108 opinions

cited 31 W. Va. 220, 337; Acts 1877, c. 107, s. 16; Acts, 1887, c. 29, s. 20; 31 W. Va. 353; Acts, 1891, c. 100; 2 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law, 220; 26 W. Va. 280; 37 W. Va. 610; Acts 1887, c. 29, ss. 16, 20; 31 W. Va. 340, 341.

1Opinion of the Court

Dext, Judge :

Nancy C. Mayer plaintiff, on the 23d day of May, 1893, instituted her suit in the Circuit Court of Ohio county against George A. Frobe & Son to recover damages for the unlawful sales of intoxicating liquor to her husband, Carl Mayer, by which she was injured in her means of support, which resulted in a judgment for seven hundred and fifty dollars upon a verdict of a jury.

From this judgment the surviving defendant obtained a writ of error, and relies cm the following assignment:

“First. The court erred in overruling defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s declaration.
“Second. The court…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  3. Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Cook v. Heck's Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Alkire v. First National Bank of ParsonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Perrine v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API