Meshbesher v. Channellene Oil & Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $500 damages for the manufacture and sale by defendant of impure oil for cooking purposes. The case was tried before Waite, J., who made findings of fact and as conclusion of law found in favor of plaintiff for $99. From an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment or for a new trial, it appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Appeal from the order of the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis denying the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the findings of fact and conclusions of the trial court, or for a new trial.
The here material allegations of the complaint are to the effect following: The defendant is, and at all the times hereinafter mentioned was, engaged in the manufacture and sale to the public and retail dealers of sweet oil to be used as a food and for cooking purposes, and represented the same to be healthful and pure and adapted for use in cooking food. On or about February 9, 1908,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Moon v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Bott v. PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Baxter v. CoughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Davis v. Van Camp Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Klein v. Duchess Sandwich Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Kelley v. John R. Daily Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
- Catani v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.