Central Holding Corp. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TAPPAAN, J., pro tem.
The action out of which this proceeding arose was one in w7hich the Neale Rainbow Light Corporation was plaintiff and the petitioners were defendants. The plaintiff in that action recovered a judgment as against defendants and petitioners. Petitioners then made a motion for a new trial, which was denied and they then filed a notice of appeal, request for transcript under the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure and an undertaking in more than double the amount of the judgment. This undertaking upon appeal was executed by two corporations, who at the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- King v. Pony Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1900
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lyders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933