Legal Opinion

Central Holding Corp. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1932No. Docket No. 8216PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TAPPAAN, J., pro tem.

The action out of which this proceeding arose was one in w7hich the Neale Rainbow Light Corporation was plaintiff and the petitioners were defendants. The plaintiff in that action recovered a judgment as against defendants and petitioners. Petitioners then made a motion for a new trial, which was denied and they then filed a notice of appeal, request for transcript under the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure and an undertaking in more than double the amount of the judgment. This undertaking upon appeal was executed by two corporations, who at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. Pony Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lyders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API