Legal Opinion
Ernest Dunlevie Associates v. Prieto
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 22, 1966No. Civ. No. 7803PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
This is an appeal from an order, in response to a petition for instructions in a guardianship proceeding, directing payment of a “Real Estate Broker’s fee.” Appellants, Frank Prieto and Dora Joyce Prieto, are the guardians of the estate of a minor. Respondents, Ernest Dunlevie Associates and Eugene E. Therieau, are the petitioners who sought the order from which the appeal is taken.
Each side to the controversy, in its briefs, assert facts wholly unsupported by the record. Nevertheless, those eoneededly true are included in the following statement.
The minor, Frank Prieto III was the allottee…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Squire v. CapoemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Haas v. GreenwaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Davis v. ChipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Firpo v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Consul Limited, Kenneth B. Wilson Dba Ken Wilson Associates v. Solide Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, and Hrh Operating Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Preach v. Monter RainbowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Merrifield v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Porter v. Arthur Murray, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.