Legal Opinion

Davis v. Chipman

California Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 13122PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The defendant, as trustee under the last will and testament of Josephine A. Phelps, deceased, was on the twenty-fourth day of April, 1924, the owner of certain described real property situated in the county of San Mateo and comprising 1400 acres of land or thereabouts. On said last-named day, defendant gave to Thomas B. Dozier, Jr., an option to purchase said real property for the sum of $250,000, which said option is, in so far as the same is necessary for the purposes of this action, in the following words and figures:

“It is hereby agreed that I will sell and convey to you or your assignee,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Riley v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Wise v. RadisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Haas v. GreenwaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Shaffer v. BeinhornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Tyrone v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Rhode v. BartholomewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Hunter v. CunningOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Isenberg v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Gastine v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API