Legal Opinion

Bixler v. Summerfield

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1902PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. R„ S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

The original bill in this case was filed by the appellant, Samuel J. Bixler, on January 9, 1901. To this original bill a general and special demurrer was filed, which was sustained. Thereupon, and afterwards on March 6, 1901, the appellant filed his amended bill against the appellees, Nelson G. Summerfield, and his wife, Lizzie Summerfield, and Sophia H. Hoff, and the Story Finishing Company, alleging the latter to be a corporation, existing under the laws of Illinois and organized on or about April 28, A. D. 1893, for the purpose, as set forth in its charter, of “carrying on the business of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dodge v. WoolseySupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. People ex rel. Peabody v. Chicago Gas Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. People ex rel. Moloney v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Chicago Mutual Life Indemnity Ass'n v. HuntIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Waterbury v. Merchants' Union Express Co.New York Supreme Court · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1911
  2. Klein v. Independent Brewing Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Imperial Building Co. v. Chicago Open Board of TradeIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Conway v. ConnersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Abbott v. LovingIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API