Legal Opinion

Chicago Mutual Life Indemnity Ass'n v. Hunt

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1889PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. M. F. Ttjley, Judge, presiding. This was an information in chancery, filed by the Attorney General, on behalf of the People of the State of Illinois, against the Chicago Mutual Life Indemnity Association and its officers, praying that said officers be required to show cause why they should not be removed from office, or the business of the association closed, and that if it should appear that said officers or any of them…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. M. F. Ttjley, Judge, presiding. This was an information in chancery, filed by the Attorney General, on behalf of the People of the State of Illinois, against the Chicago Mutual Life Indemnity Association and its officers, praying that said officers be required to show cause why they should not be removed from office, or the business of the association closed, and that if it should appear that said officers or any of them had been guilty of fraud, or any material irregularity or violation of law to the injury of the association, or of…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This is a proceeding instituted by the Attorney General under the 12th section of the act of 1883 providing for the organization and management of mutual benefit societies. (1 Starr & Curtis’ Stat. 1348.) That section provides that-whenever any corporation, association or society organized or having transacted business under the provisions of said act, shall neglect or refuse to make its .annual statements as required by the act, or whenever the Auditor shall find, upon examination as provided in section 10 of the act, that any willfully false or untrue statements in any material respect…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ward v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Hunt v. Chicago Horse & Dummy Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Attorney-General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  4. Strong v. McCaggWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  5. St. Louis & Sandoval Coal & Mining Co. v. Sandoval Coal & Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People Ex Rel. Kunstman v. NaganoIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Lehman v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Wuller v. Chuse Grocery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Bixler v. SummerfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API