Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Moloney v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1898PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hqn. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

This is an information in the nature of a quo warranto, filed by the Attorney General in the circuit court of Cook county, in the name and on behalf of the People of the State of Illinois, against Pullman’s Palace Car Company. Said company is a corporation, organized in 1867 by a special act of the legislature of Illinois, entitled “An act to incorporate Pullman’s Palace Car Coinpany.” (2 Private Laws of 1867, p. 337.) That act is as follows:. “Section 1. Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, represented in the General Assembly: That George M. Pullman, JohnCrerar and Norman…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Peabody v. Chicago Gas Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Northside Railway Co. v. WorthingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Carroll v. City of East St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Rockhold v. Canton Masonic Mutual Benevolent SocietyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. American Loan & Trust Co. v. Minnesota & Northwestern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Rector v. Hartford Deposit Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Calumet & Chicago Canal & Dock Co. v. ConklingIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. People ex rel. Healy v. SheddIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State Ex Rel. Weede v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  5. People ex rel. Shallberg v. Central Union Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API