Legal Opinion
Bruton v. Tearle
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1931No. Docket No. 7802PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
This is a suit by Josephine Park Tearle for the sum of $9,932.50 admitted to be unpaid alimony awarded her under a decree of divorce in New York.
The cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury upon an agreed statement of facts. Judgment was ordered for the plaintiff and defendant appeals upon typewritten transcripts. Pending the appeal Mrs. Tearle died and her administrator has been duly substituted in her stead. We may continue to refer to her herein as the plaintiff in the action. Plaintiff obtained a decree of divorce from defendant in the state of New York on November 21, 1912,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Soule v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Cummings v. CummingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Rinkenberger v. RinkenbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Crawford v. CrawfordNew York Supreme Court · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Keck v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Bruton v. TearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Shibley v. ShibleyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Creager v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Shields v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.