Legal Opinion

Rinkenberger v. Rinkenberger

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1929No. Docket No. 3778PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Los Angeles finding that there is due the plaintiff the sum of $7,277, based upon a judgment of divorce entered in the Superior Court of King County, in the State of Washington, adjudging the plaintiff in this action entitled to a divorce from the defendant herein, and awarding the plaintiff alimony, payable in monthly ■ installments, the overdue monthly installments amounting to the sum just herein stated. From this judgment the defendant appeals.

Upon this appeal the defendant sets forth two grounds alleged as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Winslow v. GohransenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Ruge v. RugeWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Soule v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Keck v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Shibley v. ShibleyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Creager v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Morrow v. MorrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API