Legal Opinion
Charles Parisi, Inc. v. Gloucester Marine Railways Corp.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided August 18, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
In February, 1975, the fishing vessel St. Anthony, which was owned by the plaintiff (“Parisi”) and was in drydock on the premises of the defendant (“Gloucester Marine”) for repairs, was damaged by fire so extensively that it was deemed to be a total loss. Parisi brought this action on May 9, 1975, to recover damages for the negligence of Gloucester Marine’s employees in causing the fire.
Parisi carried hull insurance in the amount of $135,000, covering damage to the vessel. That policy was written by the intervener (“Glacier General”) and included a clause reserving to Glacier General the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aetna Insurance v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Murray v. GrossmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Neitlich v. Amica Mutual Insurance Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Pollock v. Art Institute of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Rose & Lucy, Inc. v. F/V Saint Anna MariaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1968
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gloucester Marine Railways Corp. v. Charles Parisi, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- Gloucester Marine Railways Corp. v. Charles Parisi, Inc., John Joseph Taylor and Trans-Atlantic Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988