Murray v. Grossman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
This is an action of contract wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover an unpaid balance upon a promissory note, executed in Florida, on February 7, 1925, by the defendant, and made payable to the plaintiff or order. The defendant’s substituted answer is as follows: “And now comes the defendant in the above entitled case and for answer denies each and every material item, allegation and particular in the plaintiff’s writ and declaration contained. And further answering, the defendant says that if he ever owed the plaintiff anything he has paid him in full and now owes him nothing. And further…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Eddy v. JohnstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Levey v. HigginsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Lincoln v. FinkelsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Federal National Bank v. O'ConnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- New England Merchants National Bank of Boston v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Roger Williams Grocery Co. v. SykesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Pollock v. Art Institute of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Charles Parisi, Inc. v. Gloucester Marine Railways Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.