Legal Opinion
Rose & Lucy, Inc. v. F/V Saint Anna Maria
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 10, 1968No. 64-40PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANCIS J. W. FORD, District Judge.
A collision at sea on January 4, 1964 between the fishing vessels ROSE AND LUCY and SAINT ANNA MARIA has given rise to protracted litigation in this court. Both vessels were insured under hull policies and P. & I. policies by the same underwriters, Resolute Insurance Company and Lloyds Underwriters and/ or Institute of London Underwriters.
The ROSE AND LUCY sank as a result of the collision. When the underwriters refused to pay the $30,000 face value of the hull insurance policy on this vessel, the owner brought an action in this court in which it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- The " Potomac"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Graustein v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Federal Ins. Co. v. Detroit Fire & Marine Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Rose and Lucy, Inc. v. Resolute Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Krueger v. Merriman ElectricColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
- Charles Parisi, Inc. v. Gloucester Marine Railways Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983