Legal Opinion
Pandey v. Roulston
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 3, 1995PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, Vijai B. Pandey, appeals from a judgment entered after a decision by a single justice of this court denying relief on the plaintiffs petition under G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1992 ed.). We affirm the judgment.
The plaintiff has brought a pro se action in the Superior Court against the defendant attorney seeking damages. The plaintiffs complaint asserts multiple claims that the defendant’s legal representation in connection with another action by the plaintiff for legal malpractice was deficient. The plaintiffs pro se petition under G. L. c. 211, § 3, seeks various relief in connection…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Avery v. SteeleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Soja v. T. P. Sampson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Foley v. Lowell Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Pandey v. Ware Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- McGowan v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Mt. Ivy Press, L.P. v. DefonsecaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Johanson v. AldridgeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
- Coady v. StackMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1995
- Wilshire Credit Corp. v. ScottMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.