Legal Opinion

Pandey v. Ware Division of the District Court Department

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 20, 1992PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action under G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1990 ed.), arises out of an attempt by the plaintiffs to obtain relief from judgments entered in a small claims proceeding in the Ware Division of the District Court Department. In December, 1990, the plaintiffs filed a complaint against United Parcel Service (UPS), alleging that UPS had lost a package containing musical equipment worth $840 which the plaintiffs had shipped to a third party. The plaintiffs alleged total damages of $1,500. After a hearing, a District Court judge in the small claims session found in favor of the plaintiffs against UPS.2…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fogarty v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Daum v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matthews v. D'ArcyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Pandey v. RoulstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Fijal v. AndersonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  4. Zullo v. Culik Law P.C.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  5. Devon Services, Inc. v. WellmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API