Legal Opinion

Coady v. Stack

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided October 25, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, P.J.

This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. RAD. A, Rule 8B appeal by the defendant of (1) the denial of his motion to vacate a default and file his answer late, and (2) the court’s entry of a default judgment in the amount of $20,622.00 without a hearing for the assessment of damages.

The parties’ Rule 8B agreed statement and the docket entries disclose that the plaintiff commenced this action on May 18, 1994 to recover for the defendant’s alleged breach of contract and G.L.c. 93A unfair and deceptive practices in inadequately repairing the defendant’s motor vehicle and in overbilling for services actually…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,803 Steven Flaks v. David I. Koegel and Flora Mir Candy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Productora E Importadora De Papel v. FlemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Riley v. DAVISON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Bucchiere v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Oyegbola v. DeSimoneMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  2. Giuliano v. VaccaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004
  3. Bollen v. Camp KingsmontMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  4. Evangelidis v. CuevasMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
  5. U.S. Environmental Rental Corp. v. Lease One Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API