Legal Opinion
Hall v. Sullivan
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 7, 2005No. CIV.A. WDQ-04-2846PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge.
This memorandum addresses Sodexho Inc.’s (“Sodexho”) Motion to Quash a Subpoena served by Plaintiff on January 15, 2005 (Paper No. 16), which Plaintiff, Mr. Christopher Hall, (“Plaintiff’ or “Mr. Hall”) opposed (Paper No. 18). Sodexho, which is not a party to this litigation, moved to quash a subpoena duces tecum served on it by the plaintiff, asserting several grounds including failure to effect proper service of the subpoena (Paper No. 16). Specifically, Sodexho argued that Fed R. Civ. P. 45 (“Rule 45” or “Rule”1) required personal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa AnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federal Trade Commission v. Compagnie De Saint-Gobain-Pont-A-MoussonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- King v. Crown Plastering Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Elat v. NgoubeneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Call of the Wild Movie, LLC v. DOES 1-1,062District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Sterling v. Ourisman Chevrolet of Bowie Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Oceanfirst Bank v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Maxtena, Inc. v. MarksDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.