Legal Opinion
Delaney v. Deere and Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided October 3, 1997No. 96-1107-JTMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MARTEN, District Judge.
The present action arose when a large round bale fell from a John Deere front loader attached to plaintiff Gene Delaney’s tractor. Delaney brings the present product liability and negligence action against the manufacturer of the tractor and front loader, alleging inadequate design and warnings.
Two motions are currently outstanding. First, Deere moves for summary judgment, largely on the grounds that warnings given were adequate and Delaney knew and understood those warnings. Second, Delaney moves to amend the complaint to advance a claim for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Macerich Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Richard D. Ellis v. El Paso Natural Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Delaney v. Deere & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000