Legal Opinion

Delaney v. Deere & Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 19, 2000No. 97-3321PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Gene Delaney appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants-appellees Deere and Company and John Deere Limited (“Deere”). The district court dismissed Mr. Delaney’s product liability claims on the basis that Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-3305(c) (1994) does not require a manufacturer to either warn or protect against hazards that are open and obvious, and that Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A comment j establishes as a matter of law that an adequate warning precludes a finding that a product is in defective condition. See…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. Gloria Rios v. F. Calvin Bigler, M.D. And Lauren A. Welch, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Nathan Gardels v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. Delaney v. Deere and Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. Delaney v. Deere and Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Palazzo v. CorioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. Robert v. Baer v. David Chase Chase Films Inc., a Delaware Corporation John Does A-ZCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. Palazzo v. CorioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  4. Tung Nguyen v. AK Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Perkins v. Chris Hunt Water Hauling Contractor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API