Legal Opinion

Matson v. Parking Service Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1976No. 330, 337, 341, 347PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Judge:

This is an appeal from a decree entered below which denied appellants-defendants’ motion for summary judgment and which, sua sponte, entered summary judgment on behalf of plaintiffs-appellees. We hold that summary judgment was prematurely entered in this case and we therefore reverse.

The instant controversy arises from a class action in equity instituted by the plaintiffs-appellees Marjorie H. Matson and Sylvia S. Sales, individually and on behalf of all other persons who patronized certain public parking garages owned by the Public Parking Authority of the City of Pittsburgh…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Husak v. Berkel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. City of Pittsburgh v. Alco Parking Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Prince v. PavoniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Alco Parking Corp. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dunn v. TetiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Temple v. MILMONT FIRE CO.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Cranshaw Construction Inc. v. GhristSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Cranshaw Construction Inc. v. GhristSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Dunn v. TetiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API