Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cranshaw Construction Inc. v. Ghrist

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 4, 1981No. 545Published

1DissentShertz, Judge

The instant record does not establish Appellant as a statutory employer, either as a matter of fact or as a matter of law. Appellant is, therefore, neither immune from common law liability nor insulated against joinder as an additional defendant. Thus, the lower court was correct, albeit for reasons with which I respectfully disagree, in denying Appellant’s motion for summary judgment.1

A motion for summary judgment may properly be granted only where there is no genuine issue as to any material facts and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Rule 1035, Pa.R.Civ.P. The…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Hefferin v. StempkowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Edward Aaron Mays v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  5. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HartliebSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API