Legal Opinion
State Note Board v. State Ex Rel. Attorney General
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 5, 1932No. 4-2882PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas C. Trimble, Jr.,
Special Justice. Appellee, State of Arkansas, through her Attorney General, filed suit against the State Note Board, attacking as unconstitutional § 17 of act No. 15, passed at the second extraordinary session of the Legislature of 1932, the same being in words and figures as follows, to-wit:
“ Section 17. It shall be the duty of the State Note Board to issue short-term notes in lieu of all legal vouchers or warrants now or hereafter issued for work, labor, materials, or supplies, heretofore done or furnished by any contractor, subcontractor, materialman or laborer in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State ex rel. Anaconda Copper Mining Co. v. ClancyMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- In re Governor's ProclamationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Sims v. WeldonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Ex Parte FurtonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. State Board of EducationIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Pierson v. HendricksenMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Sebastian Bridge Dist. v. Lynch, Chancery ClerkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Pope v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Smith v. Refunding Board of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.