Legal Opinion

Page v. Street Improvement District No. 11

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 26, 1942No. 4-6699 and 4-6717 (consolidated)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

December 13, 1941, Earl Page, as treasurer of state, and the state highway commission, appealed from a Pulaski chancery court decree rendered in a cause wherein exceptions had been filed by Paving Improvement District No. 11 of Russellville, and Annexes Nos. 1 and 2 to District No. 11.

Acting, as it thought, within the provisions of Act No. 385, approved March 26, 1941, (p. 1045), the commission determined total cost of that part of the paving district and the two annexes that represented highway continuations which, on or before January 1, 1939, were located within the corporate limits of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sebastian Bridge District v. State Refunding BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  2. Smith v. Refunding Board of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clayton, State Treasurer v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Page, State Tr. v. Paving Imp. Dist. No. 4 of MariannaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API