Todd v. Betttngen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $4,000 for the breach of a contract. The report on the former appeal will be found in 98 Minn. 170. From an order, F. V. Brown, J., granting plaintiff’s motion to amend and supplement his amended complaint and for a new trial upon the framing of such issues as should be made upon such amended complaint, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.
Plaintiff’s original complaint set forth facts without separate statements of causes of action, and sought different kinds of both equitable and legal relief. The trial court, after argument, placed the cause upon the jury calendar. On trial a jury was called. Having heard the testimony, the court disposed of the controversy as a matter of law and directed a verdict for the defendant. It subsequently denied plaintiff’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. From that order an appeal was taken to this court, which sustained the view of the trial judge…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ladd v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Hatch v. . Central National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Smith v. . SavinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Esch Bros. v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Anderson v. First Nat. BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ginsberg v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Lial v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Hancock v. LukeUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- Detroit Vapor Stove Co. v. J. C. Weeter Lumber Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
- Disbrow v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.