Legal Opinion

People v. Mitsunaga

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1928No. Docket No. 1595PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (W. J.), J., pro tem.

Appellant was accused by information filed by the district attorney of Kings County of the crime of possession of a still used in the manufacture of intoxicating liquor. Following his conviction by a jury he filed motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment. He now appeals from the orders of the court denying these motions and from the judgment.

Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict and that the corpus delicti was not proved. These contentions may be considered together. By the evidence presented by the prosecution it was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. NewellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. People v. CreeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. People v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. People v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. LatonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Randolph v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Johns v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. People v. FrahmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API