State v. Vigil
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant pled guilty to statutory rape. Section 40A-9-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6). His appeal asserts: (1) the criminal information did not charge a crime; (2) the trial court did not have jurisdiction; (3) the charge should have been dismissed under § 21-1-1(95), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4, Supp.1971); and (4) his guilty plea was involuntary.
Sufficiency of the criminal information.
In defining statutory rape § 40A-9-3, supra, refers to sexual intercourse by a male with a female. It also provides the rape is a higher felony degree (from fourth to third degree) if…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Delgado v. StanleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Neller v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. VaughnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. MadrigalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. CutnoseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. KingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.