Shell v. Schollander Companies, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
The primary question in this construction defect case is which of two statutes of repose applies when a buyer enters into a purchase and sale agreement to buy an existing home. Although each statute provides for a 10-year period of repose, the two periods of repose run from different dates. One runs from “the date of the act or omission complained of.” ORS 12.115(1). The other runs from the date that construction is “substantial [ly] complet[e].” ORS 12.135(l)(b). In this case, the trial court found that plaintiff filed her action more than 10 years after “the date of the act or omission…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Securities-Intermountain, Inc. v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Vsetecka v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Cocchiara v. Lithia Motors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
- PIH Beaverton, LLC v. Super One, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Goodwin v. Kingsmen Plastering, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Wyers v. American Medical Response Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. SquiresCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- Brockway v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Goodwin v. Kingsmen Plastering, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.