Legal Opinion
City of East Cleveland v. Scales
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 25, 1983No. 44556PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDay, P.J.
On June 17, 1981, a complaint was brought in the East Cleveland Municipal Court charging that “on or about the 9th day of April AD 1981 * * * Rosetta C. Scales did unlawfully - and knowingly possess or control or have on or about her person a handgun without a handgun owner’s identification card issued to her and not being exempt or upon a suitable firing range, to wit: a .38 caliber Arminius Titan Tiger * * in violation of East Cleveland Municipal Ordinances Section 545.14(a).
Defendant-appellant Scales (“defendant”) filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that the ordinance was unconstitutional.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BradyOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Midwest Retailer Associated, Ltd. v. City of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- City of Cincinnati v. LanganOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- D.A.B.E., Inc., D/B/A Arnie's Saloon v. City of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.