Legal Opinion

Carter v. McQuade

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1890No. 13434PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal- from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County, and from an order denying a new-trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This is an action - to recover the possession or value of certain personal property. The plaintiff had judgment, and from that judgment, and an order denying a new trial, the defendant appeals.

The material facts of the case, as shown by the record, are as follows; In December, 1887, the plaintiff, Anna L. Carter, and Jacob E. Carter were husband and wife, and were residing on a tract of land in Tuolumne County. On the twenty-second day of that month they entered into a written agreement, by which he agreed to give her “a bill of sale and peaceful possession” of certain described…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burkett v. BurkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Taylor v. OpperMarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Morgan v. BallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Alferitz v. ArrivillagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. In Re the Estate of KlumpkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Ions v. HarbisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Potter v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API