Taylor v. OpperMar
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.—
The facts involved in this case are as follows: In February, 1858, the then owner of certain real property in the city of San Francisco conveyed the same to Patrick Fay and Anne Fay, his wife, for the expressed consideration of $1,250. In January, 1864, the husband executed to the wife a quitclaim deed of the same property, and the deed contained this clause: “To have and to hold to her sole use, all and singular, the above-mentioned and described premises, together with the appurtenances, unto the said party of the second part, her heirs and assigns, forever.” The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frey v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Burkett v. BurkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Graff v. MiddletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Thomason v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Rego v. PeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Alferitz v. ArrivillagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- In Re the Estate of KlumpkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Ions v. HarbisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Flournoy v. FlournoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.