Legal Opinion

Taylor v. OpperMar

California Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1889No. 11954PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.—

The facts involved in this case are as follows: In February, 1858, the then owner of certain real property in the city of San Francisco conveyed the same to Patrick Fay and Anne Fay, his wife, for the expressed consideration of $1,250. In January, 1864, the husband executed to the wife a quitclaim deed of the same property, and the deed contained this clause: “To have and to hold to her sole use, all and singular, the above-mentioned and described premises, together with the appurtenances, unto the said party of the second part, her heirs and assigns, forever.” The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frey v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Burkett v. BurkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Graff v. MiddletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Thomason v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Rego v. PeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Alferitz v. ArrivillagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. In Re the Estate of KlumpkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Ions v. HarbisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Flournoy v. FlournoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API