Legal Opinion

Matlack v. City of Wichita

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1965No. 44,193PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion o£ the court was delivered by

Parker, C. J.:

This was an action to quiet title to a strip o£ land condemned by the City of Wichita, Kansas, for the widening of Kellogg Street but claimed not to have been used for such purpose. The facts which were stipulated will be summarized.

In June, 1950, the City of Wichita condemned various tracts of land including Lots 170 and 172 facing Ida Avenue, belonging to Roger W. Estep and his wife, for the purpose of opening and widening Kellogg Street. The City of Wichita paid the Esteps the full value of the fee. No claim has been made that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  2. McAlpine v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. City of Burlingame v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Gadarl v. City of HumboldtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. HuffordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Concerned Citizens, United, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Biery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Pratt v. GrieseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Riverside Drainage District v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API