Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1922No. 23,592PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from Osborne district court; William R. Mitchell, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The plaintiff brought this suit to quiet his title to some land in Osborne which was condemned in 1879 for railway sidetracks, depots, workshops, water station and stockyards. Plaintiff is the- successor in title to the fee holder of 1879, and the defendant is the successor of the railway corporation for whose use the property was condemned.

Notwithstanding the lapse of years and the general development of- that community, only a limited portion of the land condemned in 1879 has yet been used or needed for railway purposes — the usual…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kansas Central Railway Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. KindredSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Northwestern Railroad v. SchmuckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. DavenportSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Quinn v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Marks v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Haley v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Hudson v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. Harvest Queen Mill & Elevator Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API