Legal Opinion

McAlpine v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 9, 1904No. 13,347PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error from Wyandotte court of common pleas; William G. Holt, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

CuNningham, J. :

This action was one in ejectment for the recovery of a three-fourths interest in a tract of land lying between the platted portion of what is now Kansas City, Kan., on the west, and the Missouri river on the east. The plaintiffs are the heirs of the proprietors of the original plat of Wyandotte, now Kansas City, Kan. This tract in dispute is of irregular form, and, as originally delimited upon the plat, was from 700 to 900 feet wide and perhaps a mile long. Upon the plat it was designated and dedicated as “levee.” By reliction and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Barclay v. Richard W. Howell's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Archer v. Salinas CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. City of St. Paul v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Town of Lake View v. Le BahnIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Emporia v. HumphreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. Eble v. State ex rel. BondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. City of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Gadarl v. City of HumboldtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Biery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API