Legal Opinion
In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Antibiotic Antitrust Actions
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 29, 1971No. M 19-93A and the following actions: 70 Civ. 3157, 69 Civ. 5632, 69 Civ. 3220, 69 Civ. 1629, 69 Civ. 5154, 70 Civ. 3738, 70 Civ. 3737, 69 Civ. 4746, 69 Civ. 3294, 71 Civ. 570, 70 Civ. 3158, 69 Civ. 3195, 70 Civ. 1074 and 69 Civ. 2838PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MISCELLANEOUS ORDER NO. 71-12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIMS OF INSURERS AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
MILES W. LORD, District Judge
(By Assignment).
Following discussions in New York and Minneapolis on January 14-15, 1971 and February 9-10, 1971, regarding “standing,” “remoteness” and “passing-on,” the court established a schedule for filing and briefing motions to dismiss, and motions for summary judgment, or partial summary judgment, in several categories of cases. (See Miscellaneous Order 71-6). It was the court’s belief that the issues of “standing” and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- The State of Minnesota v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Wilson v. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1970
- In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Antibiotic Antitrust ActionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
3Cited by2 opinions
- Oxford First Corp. v. PNC Liquidating Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- City & County of Denver v. American Oil Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1971