Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 21, 1970No. Civ. A. C-2619PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ARRAJ, Chief Judge.
Defendant Ringsby Truck Lines is a common carrier which transports goods in Colorado and Wyoming. Plaintiffs are Ringsby employees who work as truck drivers and warehousemen. Plaintiffs allege, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, that they have been and continue to be injured by conduct on the part of Ringsby which violates the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (1964). It is alleged that Ringsby and other common carriers have entered into an agreement to divide up and control their business between certain points in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Radovich v. National Football LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Radiant Burners, Inc. v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- In Re McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Karseal Corporation v. Richfield Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Conference of Studio Unions v. Loew's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Reibert v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Boshes v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973
- 2660 Woodley Road Joint Venture v. ITT Sheraton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Consolidated Dairy Products Co. v. Bar-T Ranch Dairy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.