Legal Opinion

Lanktree v. Lanktree

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 1919No. Civ. No. 2900PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered upon an order sustaining, without leave to amend, a general demurrer to her complaint.

For the purposes of this decision, the facts alleged in the complaint are binding upon both parties and the court. The question is not one of fact, hut of law. If the plaintiff’s allegations are true, is she entitled to relief ? At the instance of a wife who alleges she has procured a collusive decree of divorce, will a court of equity set it aside because she also alleges in substance that she bartered her marital rights for a smaller sum than she might have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Rehfuss v. RehfussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Beard v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Mitchell v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hill v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. Hendricks v. HendricksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Roberts v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Calvert v. CalvertNevada Supreme Court · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API